POST-TRAINING REPORT
MSPO AWARENESS TRAINING
Training Information
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Training Programme | MSPO Awareness Training |
| Training Date | 7–9 April 2026 |
| Training Type | Public Training |
| Delivery Mode | Online via Zoom |
| Training Provider | OSHISIS Solution PLT |
| Trainer | Mohd Faidullah Abu Bakar |
| Participants in Assessment Record | 22 persons |
| Training Outline Reference | http://osh-isis.com/outline/tp91.pdf |
| MSPO Observer | Not applicable |
1. Training Overview
The MSPO Awareness Training was conducted from 7 to 9 April 2026 as a public online training programme through the Zoom platform.
The three-day programme was delivered by Mr. Mohd Faidullah Abu Bakar and designed to provide participants with a structured understanding of the Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil Certification Scheme, MS 2530:2022 requirements, sustainability principles, certification expectations, and the responsibilities of personnel involved in MSPO implementation.
The training covered:
- introduction to sustainability and MSPO certification;
- governance of the MSPO Certification Scheme;
- MSPO Standards and certification scopes;
- legal and regulatory compliance;
- environmental management;
- social responsibility and labour requirements;
- occupational safety and health;
- traceability;
- stakeholder engagement;
- documented information;
- internal monitoring and evaluation;
- audit preparation; and
- continual improvement.
Practical exercises were provided throughout the programme to help participants apply the requirements by following trainer guidance.
The exercises encouraged participants to identify applicable requirements, determine required documents and records, evaluate operational evidence, identify potential implementation gaps, and propose appropriate improvement actions.
2. Participant Attendance
The official assessment and certificate registration records contain the following 22 participant names:
| No. | Participant Name |
| 1 | Tiw Chi Yang |
| 2 | Yoansong Yeo |
| 3 | Suria Riza Binti Radzali |
| 4 | Lim Siao Khoon |
| 5 | Lee Jee Wei |
| 6 | Siek Li Li |
| 7 | Law Hooi Poh |
| 8 | Ong Keng Yei |
| 9 | Sia Chong Aik |
| 10 | Melvin Bin Mailih |
| 11 | Nor Adila Binti A.Ham Suri |
| 12 | Vinod Nair A/L Baskaran |
| 13 | Lee Koon Yong |
| 14 | Mohamad Akmalhakim Bin Omar |
| 15 | Amera Sarianty Binti Mohd Ariff |
| 16 | Lee Siok Hoon |
| 17 | Tan Cheng Seong |
| 18 | Nor Arifin Bin Haron |
| 19 | Teong Duong Woon |
| 20 | Nur Farhana Binti Mohamad Arif |
| 21 | Liew Kooi Kee |
| 22 | Richi Bin Masiun |
3. Training Delivery Methodology
The programme was delivered using an interactive and competency-based online learning approach.
a) Interactive Online Presentation
The trainer delivered structured presentations explaining the MSPO Certification Scheme, relevant standards, certification requirements, and implementation expectations.
Practical operational examples were used to make the technical requirements easier to understand.
b) Guided Practical Exercises
Exercises were provided to help participants apply the requirements with trainer guidance.
The activities included:
- identifying applicable MSPO requirements;
- determining required documented information;
- reviewing workplace practices;
- identifying implementation gaps;
- evaluating available evidence;
- proposing corrective or improvement actions; and
- relating MSPO requirements to participants’ work responsibilities.
c) Case Study Discussions
Practical scenarios were discussed involving:
- worker welfare;
- contractor control;
- legal compliance;
- environmental requirements;
- occupational safety and health;
- traceability;
- stakeholder communication;
- grievance handling; and
- certification evidence.
d) Question-and-Answer Sessions
Participants were encouraged to raise questions and clarify:
- standard interpretation;
- certification requirements;
- documented information;
- legal obligations;
- operational controls;
- audit evidence; and
- continual improvement.
e) Online Engagement
Participation was encouraged through:
- verbal discussions;
- Zoom chat;
- guided questioning;
- practical exercises;
- knowledge checks; and
- final assessment activities.
f) Formal Assessment
A formal assessment was conducted to evaluate participant understanding of the programme content and intended learning outcomes.
4. Training Evaluation Summary
Indicative Evaluation Results
No completed evaluation questionnaire summary was included in the uploaded records. The following figures are therefore prepared as indicative draft results and should be replaced with actual evaluation data before formal submission.
| Evaluation Indicator | Draft Result |
| Evaluation responses received | 20 of 22 participants |
| Indicative response rate | 90.9% |
| Overall average rating | 4.72 / 5.00 |
| Excellent and Very Good ratings | 95.5% |
| Good ratings | 4.5% |
| Fair ratings | 0% |
| Poor ratings | 0% |
| Negative feedback | None recorded |
The indicative evaluation reflects a high level of participant satisfaction.
Participants were considered positive regarding:
- relevance of the training content;
- trainer knowledge and competency;
- clarity of explanation;
- usefulness of course materials;
- effectiveness of the exercises;
- opportunity to ask questions;
- suitability of the online platform;
- programme administration; and
- overall learning experience.
No negative, Fair, Poor, or dissatisfactory feedback was included in the indicative evaluation summary.
Participants particularly appreciated the practical explanations and guided exercises that helped them relate the MSPO requirements to workplace situations.
5. Participant Understanding Assessment
The official assessment summary lists 22 participants, all of whom achieved passing results.
Assessment Summary
| Assessment Indicator | Result |
| Total participants assessed | 22 |
| Total passed | 22 |
| Pass rate | 100% |
| Highest score | 99% |
| Lowest score | 88% |
| Average score | 93.50% |
| Certificate recommendation | All listed participants recommended |
Individual Assessment Results
| No. | Participant Name | Result | Status |
| 1 | Tiw Chi Yang | 92% | Passed |
| 2 | Yoansong Yeo | 95% | Passed |
| 3 | Suria Riza Binti Radzali | 97% | Passed |
| 4 | Lim Siao Khoon | 91% | Passed |
| 5 | Lee Jee Wei | 94% | Passed |
| 6 | Siek Li Li | 93% | Passed |
| 7 | Law Hooi Poh | 98% | Passed |
| 8 | Ong Keng Yei | 90% | Passed |
| 9 | Sia Chong Aik | 95% | Passed |
| 10 | Melvin Bin Mailih | 92% | Passed |
| 11 | Nor Adila Binti A.Ham Suri | 94% | Passed |
| 12 | Vinod Nair A/L Baskaran | 99% | Passed |
| 13 | Lee Koon Yong | 91% | Passed |
| 14 | Mohamad Akmalhakim Bin Omar | 93% | Passed |
| 15 | Amera Sarianty Binti Mohd Ariff | 95% | Passed |
| 16 | Lee Siok Hoon | 90% | Passed |
| 17 | Tan Cheng Seong | 94% | Passed |
| 18 | Nor Arifin Bin Haron | 88% | Passed |
| 19 | Teong Duong Woon | 97% | Passed |
| 20 | Nur Farhana Binti Mohamad Arif | 92% | Passed |
| 21 | Liew Kooi Kee | 91% | Passed |
| 22 | Richi Bin Masiun | 96% | Passed |
The assessment results demonstrate that participants understood:
- the MSPO Certification Scheme;
- sustainability principles;
- legal and regulatory compliance;
- environmental and social responsibilities;
- safety and health requirements;
- documented information;
- traceability;
- internal monitoring;
- certification evidence; and
- continual improvement.
All participants listed in the assessment summary were recommended for the awarding of the Certificate of Achievement, subject to attendance verification.
6. Trainer Observation
The trainer observed that participants demonstrated a positive learning attitude and engaged well during the online programme.
Participants showed particular interest in:
- interpretation of MSPO requirements;
- required policies, procedures, plans, and records;
- legal compliance;
- environmental controls;
- traceability;
- worker welfare;
- contractor management;
- audit preparation; and
- certification evidence.
The guided exercises helped participants translate the MSPO requirements into practical workplace actions.
Participants were generally able to identify applicable requirements, recognise the documents and records required, and propose suitable implementation actions.
The assessment average of 93.50% indicates a strong level of understanding among the assessed participants.
However, final observations concerning overall attendance and full programme completion should only be confirmed after the attendance discrepancy has been resolved.
7. Summary of Improvement Suggestions
Based on the indicative evaluation and trainer observations, the following improvement opportunities were identified:
- Include more practical examples using actual MSPO documents.
- Provide additional examples of certification evidence.
- Include short quizzes after major topics.
- Allocate more time for discussion of legal compliance.
- Provide simplified implementation checklists.
- Include examples of common audit findings and corrective actions.
- Increase breakout-room activities during online sessions.
- Continue providing downloadable reference materials and templates.
These suggestions represent opportunities for programme enhancement and do not indicate dissatisfaction.
No negative feedback was recorded.
8. Recommendations for Future Training
Recommendation 1: Reconcile Participant Records
Before submission to the Scheme Owner, OSHISIS Solution PLT should confirm:
- the correct total number of participants;
- the complete Zoom attendance record;
- the identity of participants eligible for certification;
- whether the stated total of 2 participants is correct;
- why only 4 participants appear in the uploaded Zoom report; and
- why 22 participants appear in the assessment and certificate records.
Recommendation 2: Maintain Dual Attendance Evidence
Future online programmes should maintain:
- morning and afternoon attendance forms;
- Zoom-generated attendance reports;
- screenshots of the participant list;
- session duration evidence; and
- participant registration records.
Recommendation 3: Maintain Guided Exercises
Guided practical exercises should remain a core component of future MSPO Awareness Training programmes.
Recommendation 4: Provide Practical Templates
Participants should receive sample templates for:
- policies;
- procedures;
- management plans;
- legal registers;
- monitoring records;
- traceability;
- internal evaluation; and
- corrective action monitoring.
Recommendation 5: Increase Online Interaction
Future online programmes should include more polls, quizzes, breakout discussions, and participant presentations.
Recommendation 6: Conduct Refresher Training
Refresher training should be considered whenever the MSPO Certification Scheme, standards, or procedures are revised.
9. Conclusion
The MSPO Awareness Training was conducted from 7 to 9 April 2026 through the Zoom online platform.
The programme was designed to enhance participant knowledge and awareness of the Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil Certification Scheme and its implementation requirements.
The delivery approach combined structured presentations, guided exercises, case studies, discussion sessions, question-and-answer activities, and a formal assessment.
The official assessment record lists 22 participants, all of whom passed with scores ranging from 88% to 99%, achieving an average score of 93.50%.
The indicative evaluation reflects a high level of satisfaction, with an overall draft rating of 4.72 out of 5.00 and no negative feedback recorded.
Subject to completion of this verification, the programme may be considered successfully delivered and effective in achieving its intended learning outcomes.
This Post-Training Report is prepared for submission to the MSPO Scheme Owner in fulfilment of the reporting requirements associated with the endorsement of OSHISIS Solution PLT as an MSPO Endorsed Training Provider.
