POST-TRAINING REPORT
MSPO AWARENESS TRAINING
Training Information
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Training Programme | MSPO Awareness Training |
| Training Date | 2–4 March 2026 |
| Training Type | Public Training |
| Delivery Mode | Online via Zoom |
| Training Provider | OSHISIS Solution PLT |
| Trainer | Mohd Faidullah Abu Bakar |
| Total Participants | 36 persons |
| Training Outline Reference | http://osh-isis.com/outline/tp91.pdf |
| MSPO Observer | Not applicable |
1. Training Overview
The MSPO Awareness Training was successfully conducted from 2 to 4 March 2026 as a public online training programme through the Zoom platform.
The three-day programme was delivered by Mr. Mohd Faidullah Abu Bakar and attended by 36 participants representing different organisations and functions within the Malaysian palm oil industry.
The programme was designed to provide participants with a structured understanding of the Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil Certification Scheme and the implementation requirements applicable to organisations operating within the palm oil supply chain.
The training addressed:
- the purpose and structure of the MSPO Certification Scheme;
- sustainability principles relevant to the palm oil industry;
- governance of the MSPO Certification Scheme;
- applicable MSPO Standards;
- roles and responsibilities of certified organisations;
- legal and regulatory compliance;
- social responsibility and labour requirements;
- occupational safety and health;
- environmental management;
- traceability and record management;
- policies, procedures, management plans, and operational records;
- internal evaluation and monitoring;
- certification and audit expectations; and
- continual improvement.
Guided exercises were provided throughout the programme so that participants could apply the MSPO requirements by following the trainer’s explanation and guidance.
The exercises assisted participants in identifying applicable requirements, determining the documents and records required, reviewing operational practices, identifying implementation gaps, and proposing suitable improvement actions.
2. Participant Attendance
A total of 36 participant records were included in the official certification and assessment list.
| No. | Participant Name |
| 1 | Norsyahida Binti Rahim |
| 2 | Muhammad Farhan Bin Santosa |
| 3 | Kong Ka Lai |
| 4 | Wee Geik Chien |
| 5 | Ng Boo Yun |
| 6 | Salhana Binti Analuddin |
| 7 | Wong Chun Wei |
| 8 | Ignatius Then Kim Pheng |
| 9 | Wong Kim Fatt |
| 10 | Ganesan A/L Kanaratanam |
| 11 | Mohd Zul Hanapi Bin Mohammad Isal |
| 12 | Mohd Ezry Shazani Bin Shaebun |
| 13 | Nurhaziah Waniey Binti Abdul Rashid |
| 14 | Gan Eng Kha |
| 15 | Ngoi Kuan Ming |
| 16 | Alister Fabian Wahab |
| 17 | Gan Chern Ru |
| 18 | Nor Mardhiah Binti Bab Latih |
| 19 | Muhammad Hisham Bin Yamah |
| 20 | Wong Kong Nyok |
| 21 | Yap Yi Luan |
| 22 | Imrand Bin Saharom |
| 23 | Mohammad Asyraf Bin Sharin |
| 24 | Eddy Anak Jiton |
| 25 | Wong Chun Wei |
| 26 | Benjamin Raphael Tingang Joachim |
| 27 | Ling Yee Tao |
| 28 | Lim Winn |
| 29 | Irfaan Bin Mohammed Suhaimin |
| 30 | Ts. Danial Marzuk Bin Yassin |
| 31 | Siti Aisah Binti Wagiman |
| 32 | Noor Hidayah Binti Abdul Wahab |
| 33 | Abdullah Ahmad Ezan Bin Abdullah Sani |
| 34 | Nurul Hanim Binti Kamaruddin |
| 35 | Maisarah Binti Ahmad Shafiei |
| 36 | Lim Yen Mui |
All listed participants completed the assessment and achieved passing results.
Record note: The name Wong Chun Wei appears twice in the official assessment and certification source, at records 7 and 25. The attendance and certification records should be checked before final certificate issuance to confirm whether these represent two registrations or a duplicate record.
3. Training Delivery Methodology
The programme was delivered using an interactive and competency-based online learning approach.
a) Interactive Online Presentation
The trainer delivered structured presentations explaining the MSPO Certification Scheme, sustainability principles, standard requirements, documented information, and implementation expectations.
Technical requirements were supported with workplace examples to help participants understand their practical application.
b) Guided Exercises
Exercises were provided to allow participants to apply the MSPO requirements under trainer guidance.
The exercises included:
- identifying relevant MSPO requirements;
- determining applicable documents and records;
- reviewing operational situations;
- identifying potential implementation gaps;
- evaluating available compliance evidence;
- proposing appropriate corrective or improvement actions; and
- linking standard requirements to participants’ workplace responsibilities.
c) Case Study Discussion
Practical situations were discussed to help participants understand how MSPO requirements apply to operational activities.
Topics included:
- worker welfare;
- legal compliance;
- contractor management;
- safety and health;
- environmental controls;
- traceability;
- communication;
- operational records; and
- continual improvement.
d) Question-and-Answer Sessions
Participants were encouraged to raise questions throughout the programme.
The sessions enabled clarification of MSPO terminology, implementation expectations, audit evidence, certification requirements, and common operational challenges.
e) Knowledge Sharing
Participants were encouraged to share examples from their own organisations.
This supported peer learning and helped participants compare different approaches to MSPO implementation.
f) Online Engagement
Participant involvement was encouraged through:
- live discussions;
- Zoom chat responses;
- verbal questioning;
- guided exercises;
- knowledge checks; and
- final assessment activities.
g) Participant Assessment
A formal assessment was conducted to verify participant understanding of the intended learning outcomes.
4. Training Evaluation Summary
A total of 29 participant evaluation responses were recorded from 36 participants.
Evaluation Summary
| Evaluation Indicator | Result |
| Total Participants | 36 |
| Evaluation Responses | 29 |
| Response Rate | 80.6% |
| Course Rating | 4.55 / 5.00 |
| Training Provider Rating | 4.53 / 5.00 |
| Trainer Rating | 4.69 / 5.00 |
| Overall Rating | 4.60 / 5.00 |
| Negative Feedback | None recorded |
The evaluation results demonstrated a high level of participant satisfaction with the programme.
Participants responded positively regarding:
- clarity of the training content;
- alignment of learning outcomes with programme objectives;
- usefulness of the course materials;
- suitability of the programme duration;
- relevance of the training content;
- organisation of the programme;
- conduciveness of the online learning environment;
- ability to apply the knowledge gained;
- trainer engagement;
- trainer understanding of the subject;
- trainer use of updated information;
- trainer teaching techniques; and
- overall satisfaction with the trainer.
The highest evaluation component was the Trainer Rating, which achieved 4.69 out of 5.00.
The Course Rating of 4.55 and Training Provider Rating of 4.53 also demonstrated strong satisfaction with the content, programme administration, learning materials, and training arrangements.
No negative, dissatisfactory, or adverse feedback was recorded.
5. Participant Understanding Assessment
All 36 participant records achieved passing results.
Assessment Summary
| Assessment Indicator | Result |
| Total Participant Records Assessed | 36 |
| Passed | 36 |
| Pass Rate | 100% |
| Highest Score | 99% |
| Lowest Score | 90% |
| Average Score | 94.19% |
| Certificate Recommendation | All listed participants recommended |
Individual Assessment Results
| No. | Participant Name | Result | Status |
| 1 | Norsyahida Binti Rahim | 91% | Passed |
| 2 | Muhammad Farhan Bin Santosa | 94% | Passed |
| 3 | Kong Ka Lai | 97% | Passed |
| 4 | Wee Geik Chien | 92% | Passed |
| 5 | Ng Boo Yun | 95% | Passed |
| 6 | Salhana Binti Analuddin | 98% | Passed |
| 7 | Wong Chun Wei | 93% | Passed |
| 8 | Ignatius Then Kim Pheng | 91% | Passed |
| 9 | Wong Kim Fatt | 96% | Passed |
| 10 | Ganesan A/L Kanaratanam | 94% | Passed |
| 11 | Mohd Zul Hanapi Bin Mohammad Isal | 92% | Passed |
| 12 | Mohd Ezry Shazani Bin Shaebun | 99% | Passed |
| 13 | Nurhaziah Waniey Binti Abdul Rashid | 90% | Passed |
| 14 | Gan Eng Kha | 93% | Passed |
| 15 | Ngoi Kuan Ming | 97% | Passed |
| 16 | Alister Fabian Wahab | 95% | Passed |
| 17 | Gan Chern Ru | 91% | Passed |
| 18 | Nor Mardhiah Binti Bab Latih | 98% | Passed |
| 19 | Muhammad Hisham Bin Yamah | 94% | Passed |
| 20 | Wong Kong Nyok | 90% | Passed |
| 21 | Yap Yi Luan | 96% | Passed |
| 22 | Imrand Bin Saharom | 92% | Passed |
| 23 | Mohammad Asyraf Bin Sharin | 95% | Passed |
| 24 | Eddy Anak Jiton | 99% | Passed |
| 25 | Wong Chun Wei | 91% | Passed |
| 26 | Benjamin Raphael Tingang Joachim | 93% | Passed |
| 27 | Ling Yee Tao | 97% | Passed |
| 28 | Lim Winn | 94% | Passed |
| 29 | Irfaan Bin Mohammed Suhaimin | 90% | Passed |
| 30 | Ts. Danial Marzuk Bin Yassin | 98% | Passed |
| 31 | Siti Aisah Binti Wagiman | 92% | Passed |
| 32 | Noor Hidayah Binti Abdul Wahab | 95% | Passed |
| 33 | Abdullah Ahmad Ezan Bin Abdullah Sani | 96% | Passed |
| 34 | Nurul Hanim Binti Kamaruddin | 91% | Passed |
| 35 | Maisarah Binti Ahmad Shafiei | 99% | Passed |
| 36 | Lim Yen Mui | 93% | Passed |
The assessment results indicate that participants successfully understood:
- the purpose and structure of the MSPO Certification Scheme;
- the main MSPO principles and requirements;
- legal and regulatory compliance obligations;
- environmental and social requirements;
- safety and health responsibilities;
- documented information requirements;
- operational evidence;
- traceability;
- monitoring and measurement; and
- continual improvement.
All listed participants are recommended for the awarding of the Certificate of Achievement, subject to verification of the duplicate participant record.
6. Trainer Observation
The trainer observed that participants demonstrated good commitment and active involvement throughout the online programme.
Participants:
- attended the scheduled Zoom sessions;
- responded to questions;
- participated in discussions;
- completed guided exercises;
- shared examples from their organisations;
- sought clarification on technical requirements; and
- completed the final assessment.
Participants showed particular interest in:
- interpretation of MSPO requirements;
- required policies, procedures, and management plans;
- compliance evidence;
- legal requirements;
- traceability;
- environmental management;
- safety and health;
- worker welfare; and
- preparation for MSPO certification audits.
The guided exercises were effective in helping participants translate the MSPO requirements into practical organisational actions.
The strong assessment results, with an average score of 94.19%, demonstrated that participants had acquired a high level of understanding of the course content.
The trainer also observed that online interaction remained positive, and participants were generally willing to ask questions and share workplace experiences.
7. Summary of Improvement Suggestions
Based on the evaluation responses and trainer observations, the following improvement opportunities were identified:
- Include more practical examples using actual MSPO documents and operational records.
- Provide additional case studies involving plantations, mills, dealers, and supply-chain organisations.
- Include more short quizzes after major training topics.
- Allocate additional time for discussion of legal and operational compliance evidence.
- Provide simplified implementation checklists for participants to use after the programme.
- Include additional examples of common audit findings and corrective actions.
- Increase participant interaction through breakout-room exercises.
- Continue providing downloadable training materials and supporting references.
These suggestions are intended to strengthen future programmes and do not represent participant dissatisfaction.
No negative feedback was recorded.
8. Recommendations for Future Training
Recommendation 1: Maintain Guided Exercises
Guided practical exercises should remain a core component of future MSPO Awareness Training programmes.
Recommendation 2: Expand Sector-Specific Examples
Future programmes should include examples relevant to:
- oil palm plantations;
- organised and independent smallholders;
- palm oil mills;
- dealers;
- refineries;
- processing facilities; and
- supply-chain organisations.
Recommendation 3: Provide Practical Templates
Participants should be provided with sample templates for:
- policies;
- procedures;
- management plans;
- legal registers;
- monitoring records;
- traceability records;
- internal evaluation; and
- corrective action monitoring.
Recommendation 4: Include Additional Knowledge Checks
Short quizzes and interactive polls should be used to strengthen participant understanding and maintain engagement during online sessions.
Recommendation 5: Strengthen Audit Readiness Guidance
Future training should include further examples of adequate and inadequate compliance evidence to help participants prepare for certification audits.
Recommendation 6: Continue Online Learning Controls
Attendance, participation, assessment, and programme evidence should continue to be properly maintained for Scheme Owner verification.
Recommendation 7: Conduct Refresher Training
Refresher training should be considered whenever the MSPO Certification Scheme, standards, procedures, or implementation guidance are revised.
9. Conclusion
The MSPO Awareness Training conducted from 2 to 4 March 2026 through the Zoom online platform was successfully completed.
The programme achieved its objective of enhancing participant knowledge and awareness of the Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil Certification Scheme and its implementation requirements.
The training combined structured presentations, guided exercises, case studies, discussion sessions, question-and-answer activities, and a formal assessment.
The exercises enabled participants to apply MSPO requirements by following trainer guidance and relating the requirements to realistic workplace situations.
All 36 participant records achieved passing assessment results, with scores ranging from 90% to 99% and an average score of 94.19%.
The participant evaluation recorded an overall rating of 4.60 out of 5.00, including:
- Course Rating: 4.55;
- Training Provider Rating: 4.53; and
- Trainer Rating: 4.69.
No negative feedback, dissatisfaction, or adverse comments were recorded.
Based on participant assessment results, evaluation outcomes, trainer observations, and programme evidence, the training is considered successfully delivered and effective in achieving its intended learning outcomes.
All eligible participants are recommended for the awarding of the Certificate of Achievement, subject to final verification of the participant and certification records.
This Post-Training Report is submitted to the MSPO Scheme Owner in fulfilment of the reporting requirements associated with the endorsement of OSHISIS Solution PLT as an MSPO Endorsed Training Provider.








