POST-TRAINING REPORT: MSPO SIA BASIC TRAINING (MSPOSIA-25-03)
Training Name: MSPO SIA Basic Training
Training Date: 15 – 17 December 2025
Venue: KPSM, MPOB, Kuala Lumpur
Trainer: Shahrizal Ridzuan Ambak
Programme Type: Public Programme under MSPO–MPOB KPSM Collaboration
Special Note: This programme was conducted upon appointment by MSPO under the Terms of Engagement (TOE).
Training Database: https://osh-isis.com/mspo/mspolatrainingrecord.html
1. Training Overview
The MSPO SIA Basic Training was successfully conducted from 15 to 17 December 2025 at KPSM, MPOB, Kuala Lumpur. The programme was delivered by Mr. Shahrizal Ridzuan Ambak under the appointment of the Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) as part of the collaboration with MPOB Koperasi Penanam Sawit Mampan (KPSM).
The training aimed to equip participants with the knowledge and practical competency required to conduct Social Impact Assessments (SIA) in accordance with the MSPO Certification Scheme. The programme covered stakeholder identification, stakeholder consultation, impact identification, significance evaluation, mitigation planning, monitoring mechanisms, and SIA report preparation.
Interactive lectures, group discussions, practical exercises, and case studies were incorporated to ensure participants could apply the concepts learned in real operational environments.
2. Participant Attendance
A total of 28 participants attended the programme.
| No. | Participant Name |
|---|---|
| 1 | Muhammad Rais Rohaizad Razalli |
| 2 | Nur Hazwani Che Husin |
| 3 | Mohd Azrul Kamaruzzaman |
| 4 | Muhammad Fikri Mohd Tob |
| 5 | Nurhisam Maksor |
| 6 | Mohd Hafizan Nashruan Adil |
| 7 | Mohamad Daniel Afiq Mohd Zulkefli |
| 8 | Suraya Hussein |
| 9 | Sharul Akmal Sawal |
| 10 | Mohd Nur Faizal Matusin |
| 11 | Rahmat Fitri Ahmad |
| 12 | Siti Aisah Mohd Zulkefli |
| 13 | Siti Hajar Mohamed Shafiei |
| 14 | Abdul Rahim Ishak |
| 15 | Ahmad Tarmizi Osman |
| 16 | Khairul Anuar Hussin |
| 17 | Md Subri Muhammad |
| 18 | Mohd Syaifullnizam Muhamad |
| 19 | Mohd Rofazrin Mohd Nawi |
| 20 | Muhamad Shafik Sharudin |
| 21 | Nurul Hanim Kamaruddin |
| 22 | Nick Sameun Shahwal Mat Ali |
| 23 | Johari Mahasan |
| 24 | Nurul Fazira Mohd Isha |
| 25 | Muhamad Shaznan Dzahari |
| 26 | Nor Syamira Hasri |
| 27 | Nurinsyira Hasra Abdul Rahim |
| 28 | Munira Hasnol |
3. Training Delivery Methodology
The programme adopted an interactive and competency-based learning approach comprising:
a) Interactive Lectures
Comprehensive explanation of MSPO SIA requirements, principles, and methodologies.
b) Group Discussions
Participants exchanged experiences and discussed practical social sustainability issues.
c) Stakeholder Mapping Exercises
Participants practised identifying and categorising stakeholders relevant to palm oil operations.
d) Case Study Analysis
Real-life examples and SIA scenarios were used to strengthen practical understanding.
e) Practical Workshops
Participants developed impact assessments, mitigation plans, and stakeholder engagement strategies.
f) Knowledge Assessment
Assessment activities were conducted to evaluate participant understanding and learning outcomes.
4. Training Evaluation Summary
Participant feedback demonstrated a high level of satisfaction with the programme. A total of 26 evaluation forms were received from 35 participants, representing a 74% response rate.
Evaluation Statistics
| Indicator | Result |
|---|---|
| Total Participants | 35 |
| Responses Analyzed | 26 |
| Response Rate | 74% |
| Overall Average Score | 4.42 / 5.00 |
| Positive Ratings | 87.9% |
| Low Ratings | 0 |
Rating Distribution
| Rating Category | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 98 | 53.8% |
| Very Good | 62 | 34.1% |
| Good | 22 | 12.1% |
| Fair | 0 | 0% |
| Poor | 0 | 0% |
The evaluation results indicate strong participant satisfaction across all aspects of the programme. Notably, no Fair or Poor ratings were recorded, reflecting positive participant perceptions regarding training quality and delivery.
5. Participant Understanding Assessment
Participants demonstrated a good level of understanding of the training content based on assessment exercises and evaluation feedback.
Average Scores by Evaluation Area
| Evaluation Area | Average Score |
|---|---|
| Learning Objectives | 4.38 |
| Content Relevance | 4.38 |
| Slide Quality | 4.38 |
| Presenter Delivery | 4.42 |
| Trainer Rating | 4.46 |
| Interaction Opportunity | 4.46 |
| Participant Engagement | 4.42 |
The highest-rated areas were Trainer Rating and Interaction Opportunity, both scoring 4.46 out of 5.00.
These findings suggest that participants successfully achieved the intended learning outcomes and were able to understand:
- MSPO SIA requirements and expectations;
- Stakeholder engagement methodologies;
- Social impact identification and evaluation;
- Mitigation and monitoring planning; and
- SIA reporting requirements.
6. Trainer Observation
Throughout the programme, participants demonstrated strong engagement and active participation during classroom activities and practical exercises.
The trainer observed that participants were particularly engaged in:
- Stakeholder identification exercises;
- Social impact assessment activities;
- Mitigation planning workshops; and
- Group discussions involving actual plantation scenarios.
Participants were able to relate the training content to their operational experiences and demonstrated increasing competency throughout the programme. The collaborative learning environment contributed positively to knowledge transfer and understanding.
7. Summary of Improvement Suggestions
Based on participant feedback, the following opportunities for enhancement were identified:
- Include more hands-on exercises and practical activities.
- Provide additional practice using actual SIA documentation and reporting examples.
- Improve table and seating arrangements to enhance participant comfort.
Overall, the suggestions reflected participants’ desire for even greater practical exposure, while maintaining the high quality of programme delivery.
8. Recommendations for Future Training
To further strengthen future MSPO SIA Basic Training programmes, the following recommendations are proposed:
Recommendation 1
Expand practical workshops involving stakeholder consultation and social impact assessment exercises.
Recommendation 2
Provide more examples of completed SIA reports and mitigation plans.
Recommendation 3
Continue incorporating real-life case studies from palm oil operations.
Recommendation 4
Maintain the highly interactive training approach that received strong participant appreciation.
Recommendation 5
Review venue layout and seating arrangements to improve participant comfort and engagement.
9. Conclusion
The MSPO SIA Basic Training conducted from 15 to 17 December 2025 at KPSM, MPOB, Kuala Lumpur was successfully implemented under the appointment of MSPO through the Terms of Engagement (TOE).
The programme successfully achieved its objectives of enhancing participant competency in conducting Social Impact Assessments in accordance with the MSPO Certification Scheme. The training recorded an overall satisfaction score of 4.42 out of 5.00, with 87.9% positive ratings and zero low ratings, indicating strong participant acceptance of the programme.
Based on participant feedback, trainer observations, and assessment outcomes, the programme is considered highly successful in strengthening participants’ knowledge and practical capabilities in MSPO SIA implementation.
Training records and participant certification records have been updated and maintained in the OSHISIS training database for future reference and verification.
