POST-TRAINING REPORT: MSPO SIA BASIC TRAINING (MSPOSIA-25-04)
Training Date: 8 – 10 December 2025
Training Type: Public Training
Venue: Kulim Golf & Country Resort, Kulim, Kedah
Participants: 35 Persons
Training Reference: MSPO SIA Basic Training Outline (TP101)
1. Training Overview
The MSPO SIA Basic Training (MSPOSIA-25-04) was successfully conducted from 8 to 10 December 2025 at Kulim Golf & Country Resort, Kedah. The programme was designed to develop the competency of participants in conducting Social Impact Assessment (SIA) in accordance with the requirements of the Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) Certification Scheme.
The training provided participants with practical knowledge on stakeholder identification, stakeholder engagement techniques, social impact assessment methodologies, data collection approaches, impact evaluation, mitigation planning, monitoring mechanisms, and reporting requirements. The programme also included practical exercises, case studies, group discussions, stakeholder mapping activities, and assessment exercises to strengthen participant understanding and implementation capability.
The programme supports the competency requirements for individuals involved in conducting or supporting SIA activities within MSPO-certified operating units.
2. Participant Attendance
A total of 35 participants attended the programme.
| No. | Participant Name |
|---|---|
| 1 | Nor Amalina Binti Mohd Aris |
| 2 | Siti Kholijah Binti Ibrahim |
| 3 | Kuik Chia Chun |
| 4 | Goo Hong Chuan |
| 5 | Lee Ping Chew |
| 6 | Goo Ah Man |
| 7 | Ng Chai Lee |
| 8 | Nur Fatihah Binti Mohd Nordin |
| 9 | Goh Seok Suan |
| 10 | Teoh Guiek Tiang |
| 11 | Faesal Aswadi Bin Fauzi |
| 12 | Norfaizah Binti Yousof |
| 13 | Nur Shahira Binti Mohd Shafek |
| 14 | Sim Teong Kean |
| 15 | Foo Kok Hou |
| 16 | Teoh Ai Ling |
| 17 | Teoh Yang Chew |
| 18 | Quah Wei Loon |
| 19 | Ooi Chai Siew |
| 20 | Sim Ah Chong @ Sim Eng Lee |
| 21 | Ahmad Fadzil Bin Zainuddin |
| 22 | Tan Chye Fong |
| 23 | Ooi Tai Hock |
| 24 | Norshafiqah Binti Zainul |
| 25 | Ang Chee Beng |
| 26 | Nurul Syafiqah Binti Nordin |
| 27 | Noor Nabihah Romli |
| 28 | Teh Ling Sing |
| 29 | Ng Keng Hui |
| 30 | Low Yam Long |
| 31 | Tan Teck Liang |
| 32 | Chng Kee Hiang |
| 33 | Yap Ying Tian |
| 34 | Wan Tuck Kong |
| 35 | Khor Sock Choo |
3. Training Delivery Methodology
The training was delivered using a competency-based and highly interactive approach consisting of:
a) Interactive Lectures
Comprehensive explanation of MSPO SIA requirements, stakeholder management, social performance indicators, and reporting requirements.
b) Group Discussions
Participants exchanged experiences and discussed practical social issues commonly encountered within palm oil operations.
c) Stakeholder Mapping Exercises
Participants practised identifying and categorising internal and external stakeholders relevant to their operating units.
d) Case Study Analysis
Real-life SIA scenarios were analysed to improve understanding of social impacts, risk evaluation, and mitigation planning.
e) Practical Assessment Activities
Participants completed exercises involving impact identification, significance evaluation, and preparation of SIA documentation.
f) Question & Answer Sessions
Open discussions were conducted throughout the programme to address participant concerns and operational challenges.
4. Training Evaluation Summary
Participant feedback demonstrated a very positive perception of the programme.
Evaluation Statistics
| Indicator | Result |
|---|---|
| Feedback Response Rate | 55% |
| Average Satisfaction Score | 4.7 / 5.0 |
| Lowest Individual Score | Above 3.0 / 5.0 |
| Dissatisfactory Rating | None Recorded |
Key Findings
The evaluation results indicated strong participant satisfaction in the following areas:
- Relevance of training content to operational needs
- Trainer competency and subject matter expertise
- Clarity of presentation and explanation
- Practical exercises and group activities
- Applicability of training materials
- Overall programme organisation and administration
No evaluation item received a rating below 3 out of 5. Furthermore, no participant indicated dissatisfaction in any evaluation category. These findings demonstrate that the programme successfully met participant expectations and learning needs.
5. Participant Understanding Assessment
Assessment activities conducted throughout the programme indicated that participants achieved the intended learning outcomes.
Assessment Highlights
Participants demonstrated understanding in:
- MSPO SIA requirements and expectations
- Stakeholder identification and engagement processes
- Social impact identification techniques
- Impact significance evaluation
- Development of mitigation and monitoring plans
- SIA reporting methodology
- Continuous improvement requirements under MSPO
The assessment exercises and classroom participation indicated that participants were able to apply the concepts learned to realistic operational situations and social assessment scenarios.
The overall performance demonstrated a good level of competency development and readiness to participate in future SIA implementation activities.
6. Trainer Observation
Throughout the three-day programme, participants demonstrated:
- Strong engagement during discussions and practical activities.
- High interest in stakeholder engagement methodologies.
- Active participation in group exercises and case study sessions.
- Positive sharing of field experiences and operational challenges.
- Good understanding of the relationship between social sustainability and MSPO certification requirements.
The trainer observed that participants particularly benefited from practical examples, stakeholder mapping activities, and social impact evaluation exercises. The diversity of participant backgrounds also contributed to meaningful discussions and knowledge sharing.
7. Summary of Improvement Suggestions
Based on participant feedback and trainer observations, the following improvement opportunities were identified:
- Increase the number of practical SIA case studies from actual field situations.
- Provide additional examples of completed SIA reports and mitigation plans.
- Allocate more time for stakeholder mapping and impact evaluation exercises.
- Introduce additional examples related to dealer, smallholder, plantation, and mill operations.
- Continue updating training materials to reflect the latest MSPO requirements and industry expectations.
Overall, participants expressed strong appreciation for the practical nature of the programme and its relevance to their current job responsibilities.
8. Recommendations for Future Training
To further enhance future MSPO SIA Basic Training programmes, the following recommendations are proposed:
Recommendation 1
Expand practical workshop sessions involving stakeholder consultation planning and impact assessment activities.
Recommendation 2
Incorporate additional field-based examples and lessons learned from completed SIA projects.
Recommendation 3
Provide supplementary templates and tools to assist participants in conducting workplace SIA activities.
Recommendation 4
Increase discussion on social risk management, grievance mechanisms, and stakeholder communication strategies.
Recommendation 5
Encourage organisations to establish internal SIA teams to support continual compliance with MSPO social requirements.
9. Conclusion
The MSPO SIA Basic Training (MSPOSIA-25-04) conducted from 8 to 10 December 2025 at Kulim Golf & Country Resort, Kedah was successfully completed with the participation of 35 attendees.
The programme achieved its objectives of enhancing participant knowledge and competency in conducting Social Impact Assessments in accordance with MSPO requirements. Participant feedback reflected a high level of satisfaction, with an average evaluation score of 4.7 out of 5.0, no scores below 3.0, and no dissatisfactory ratings recorded.
Based on participant engagement, assessment outcomes, and trainer observations, the programme is considered successful in preparing participants to contribute effectively to SIA implementation, stakeholder engagement activities, and continual improvement efforts within MSPO-certified operations.
Training records have been updated and maintained within the OSHISIS training database for future reference and verification purposes.
